/* */

Archive for June, 2006

Anne Lamott "Traveling Mercies" Journeys Interview Podcast Segment 1 of 4

Anne Lamott "Traveling Mercies" Journeys Interview Podcast Segment 1 of 4

When I first met Anne Lamott she was just coming "out of the closet" as a follower of Jesus. Unorthodox, opinionated, outspoken and always witty on-the-air, off the air I've always been taken with her sweetness, kindness and essential goodness of heart. This is the audio of a show we did in Chicago, She had just eaten a polish hot dog and didn't feel very good…but her story of God's love and grace comes through loud and clear. (Segment One of Four. Check back every day for new postings.)

Play

Posted in "Live @ Dick Staub Interviews", A. Podcasts -- "The Kindlings Muse", Books, Spirituality in June 17, 2006 by | 2 Comments »

Art for the Audience of One

Art for the Audience of One

Yesterday I wrote about the artlessness of evangelistic driven film, observing that such projects are justified not by their art, rooted in God as creator, but by their intent to promote God as Savior. I pointed out that defenders of the film's artlessness would plead immunity : " The church will argue that this film should succeed because it openly proclaims "the gospel." By this they mean it explicitly includes scenes encouraging "receiving Jesus as Savior."

Predictably I received a response that attempted just such a defense, arguing that 1) I hadn't seen the film (though a respected friend had and reported on it's inadequacies artistically); 2) And reminded me that "Over 280 decisions for Christ resulted after the movie was shown at two Christian film festivals in Boston and Syracuse."

Lou Carlozo rightly pointed out that God's own creativity is not message driven: "Contrast that with the notion that the art must have a message to validate its worth. That in essence is the ultimate form of human hubris, because it amounts to telling God that He had no clue what He was doing when He made the waterfalls, or created the world. Must the beauty of nature have a "message"? A sign hung around it that says, "If you love this, then thank God and ask Him to be your savior"? Or does it touch our souls in a way that makes us thirst, hunger and pant to be close to the force that made all this incredible beauty? "Christian" artists who put the message before the art are not only putting the cart before the horse: They are engaging in prideful, blind behavior. Whether they realize it, they think they know how to advance God's cause better than God does. They are violating the roadmap through, if you will, unintelligent designs."

Evangelism requires a fallen world as its audience and aim, whereas art can be offered to God as the audience of one. Because God does not need to be evangelized art need not be encumbered by evangelistic intent. Evangelism-driven people seem unable to grasp, to paraphrase Rookmaaker, "Art needs no evangelistic justification."

Read the following poem and see in it the artist at work without a human audience, but displaying elegance for the unseen audience. This purity of art glorifies God. No need to embroider John 3:16 on the artist's gown, no need to end the dance with verbiage thanking "my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." Just the glorious sense of a dancer created in God's image glorifying God through creatively dancing well.

The Dancer

David Tucker

Class is over,
the teacher and the pianist gone,
but one dancer
in a pale blue
leotard stays
to practice alone without music,
turning grand jetes
through the haze of late afternoon.
Her eyes are focused
on the balancing point
no one else sees
as she spins in this quiet
made of mirrors and light–
a blue rose on a nail–
then stops and lifts
her arms in an oval pause
and leans out
a little more, a little more,
there, in slow motion
upon the air.

Posted in Kindlings Hearth Alum Blog, Performing Arts (Dance and Theatre) in June 16, 2006 by | 2 Comments »

Facing the Giants of Bad Art & Bad Theology

Facing the Giants of Bad Art & Bad Theology

I can see where this is headed and it is going to be another artistic embarrassment in the name of Jesus.

I'm referring to "Facing the Giants"a low budget film produced by Sherwood Baptist Church that just received a PG rating from the Motion Picture Association of America. The church says the G-rated movie has been upgraded because the MPAA finds the religious content offensive. Sherwood Associate Pastor Alex Kendrick wrote and starred in the movie and was a little surprised when it received a PG rating. He said, "This movie is pretty clean. There is no violence or nudity or language in it." One scene though has a coach evangelizing a football player and that according to the church is what the MPAA finds offensive.

The PG rating, of course, has turned into a PR bonanza for the church's little film due to be released in the Fall. "Alex Kendrick and Pastor Michael Catt are doing dozens of interviews with national media about their movie rating. "Time Magazine, supposed to do CNN Monday, and Good Morning America has also done a clip," Reverend Catt said." "It is set to be released in September in 85 cities on 400 screens, and this controversy might make it even bigger. "We would hope obviously to shoot for the largest audience possible, because our goal again is to reach the world from Albany Georgia," Kendrick said."

Juxtapose this story on the following quote from Derek Webb, formerly of Caedman's call, and you see why I think this will be another embarrassment. "Christian artists don't seem to be focused anymore on making great art. That's our main problem, not what our message is, not what we are trying to communicate, not how we are breaking down these barriers, but the fact that we are failing to make good engaging art is our main problem. Our industry, the way it is set up, who the gatekeepers are, it doesn't encourage making unique art. We have a radio genre that is on the whole pretty uninteresting, and it's pretty bland artistically."

Sherwood Baptist's efforts, which I'm sure are well meaning, reveal two major seismic fault lines in American Christianity and they are both rooted in our abandonment of a theology of creation.

Those who believe God is our creator and that humans have been created in God's image should understand that this means we should also be creative and should share God's passion for artistic excellence. At the end of each step of creation "God saw what He had made and IT WAS GOOD. I know big budgets don't guarantee good films, but I can guarantee you the Sherwood project made in the "hundreds of thousands of dollars" range will be noticeably inferior to other Hollywood productions. A friend who has seen the film says it clearly looks like a low-budget made-for-TV project. Why should we be excited that an aesthetically inferior product will be released on over 400 movie screens? The film includes the line "We need to give God our best in every area." Do they believe this film is our best?

The church would argue that this film should succeed because it openly proclaims "the gospel." By this they mean it explicitly includes scenes encouraging "receiving Jesus as Savior." Being forgiven, received into God's fellowship and receiving the promise of our future perfection in Heaven is no small matter, but it is only the first part of the story. Art historian and L' Abri theologian Hans Rookmaaker reminds us, "Jesus did not come to make us Christian, Jesus came to make us fully human." By this he meant that Jesus' purpose is to make us new creatures, who can once again reflect the image of God in all it's splendor–intellectually, spiritually, creatively, morally and relationally.

Any Christianity that knows God as savior, but not as creator, will produce "Christians" who are less than fully human and such people will never create good art or care to.

And this is our dilemma as people who love Jesus and art. We live in a culture that loves art but not Jesus dominated by a Christian sub-culture that loves Jesus, but not good art.

Posted in Kindlings Hearth Alum Blog in June 15, 2006 by | 8 Comments »

Da Vinci, Deeble, Berryman & Kunitz.
Podcast (05/22/06): Segment 7

Greg Wolfe, Heather Hawkins and Bryan Burton respond to audience questions and comments. Robert Deeble brings us another song "The Secret Life Of Emily Dickinson, from his "13 Stories" album and playwright and actor Jeff Berryman reads the late Stanley Kunitz' poem "The Layers. Originating from Hales Ales Brewery and Pub our first live "The Kindlings Muse" draws to a close. We love to hear your comments–post them below.

Play

Posted in "Live @ Hales", "TKM @ Homespun ~ Live Performances", A. Podcasts -- "The Kindlings Muse", Books, Spirituality in June 12, 2006 by | 2 Comments »

Staub Appears on Hallmark DaVinci Special Sunday June 11

Don't miss the "The Da Vinci Code" discussion on at Dick Staub's podcast, "The Kindlings Muse." Also this Sunday The Hallmark Channel carries a special on Opus Dei and another titled: "The Da Vinci Code: Fact and Fiction?" Dick Staub appears on the panel moderated by Krista Tippett, host of "Speaking of Faith," public radio's weekly conversation about religion, produced by American Public Media and broadcast on more than 165 public radio stations. Other panelists include Jill Levine – professor of New Testament Studies, Vanderbilt University and Ed Murray – president and chief executive officer, Faith & Values Media. Check local listings. The last we heard the "Da Vinci" broadcast was scheduled for 9AM Eastern and Pacific, 8 AM Central, 7 AM Mountain Time and 6AM Pacific. The show was taped in front of a live audience at Minnesota Public Radio. (In the spirit of Garrison Keillor, only MPR would produce a TV show in a radio station!)

Posted in Books, Kindlings Hearth Alum Blog, Movies, Spirituality in June 10, 2006 by | No Comments »

Irreligious Seattle & The Da Vinci Code
Podcast (05/22/06): Segment 6

Irreligious Seattle & The Da Vinci Code Podcast (05/22/06): Segment 6

Dan Browns "The Da Vinci Code." Does this book and movie threaten to overturn central elements of Christianity? What is the fact and fiction of it all? Our panel of Greg Wolfe, Heather Hawkins and Bryan Burton share their views on three essential questions: 1) Is "The Da Vinci Code." Anti-Christian? 2) Does it claim to be true? 3) Will it affect people's beliefs? Enjoy and tell a friend about "The Kindlings Muse."

Play

Posted in "Live @ Hales", A. Podcasts -- "The Kindlings Muse", Books, Spirituality in June 7, 2006 by | 1 Comment »

The Kindlings Blog:Dick Staub. 666: Spiritually Themed Hollywood
A Staublog

The Kindlings Blog:Dick Staub. 666: Spiritually Themed Hollywood A Staublog

Hollywood wants to make spiritual movies well at least what it understands to be spiritual movies.

With the success of "Passion of the Christ," "Lord of the Rings," and "The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe" you can expect a slew of "spiritually themed" movies. Something many have prayed for. This is a good thing, right? Well remember the closing line in "Capote," "more tears have been shed for answered prayers than unanswered ones."

Today's cleverly timed release of "The Omen 666" is an example. It is a remake and a stinker as the LA Daily News critic says, "The original Omen spawned two sequels. This lifeless remake guarantees we'll be spared the run-up to Armageddon." (Even some Christian retailers are embracing the 666 tie-in Even some Christian retailers are embracing the 666 tie-in, according to the publishers, selling paperback versions of earlier Left Behind novels for .66. "Why not make the connection?" Jenkins asks in the book's press kit. "The funny thing is that the number never appears anywhere in our books. . . . People are naturally afraid of the number because of who it is associated with. It's just a number. It's the Antichrist who is evil.")

Meanwhile back to Hollywood. 666 is a Hollywood version of a "spiritually themed movie" as was "Stigmata," based on the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, "End of Days" based on the Book of Revelation AND "The Da Vinci Code," loosely based on the Gnostic "Mary of Magdalene."

Sometimes Hollywood productions are relatively harmless, teaching some sweet lessons as in "God Almighty" where the central character played by Jim Carey is saved by Grace a character played by Jennifer Aniston after an encounter with God played by Morgan Freeman. Other times it is not so benign, such as in Da Vinci.

Here are three quick lessons.

1) Hollywood productions tend to be spiritually delusional, practicing what I call "spiritual blenderism," stick a bunch of beliefs in a blender and push the button. The trend is towards spiritual seeking without seeking God, moral and intellectual relativism and anti-Christian.
2) Hollywood productions are spiritually influential. As Phyliss Tickle reminds us in "God Talk In America," More theology is conveyed in, and probably retained from one hour of popular television, than from all the sermons that are also delivered on any given weekend in America's synagogues, churches and mosques." It does make a difference,–a poll in the UK said people are twice as likely to believe Jesus is married after the Da Vinci code. In our country Christian Smith says even the typical Christian teen believes what he calls, "Moralistic Therapeutic Deism."
3) Christian reactions tend to be unproductive: cocooning, combating and conforming won't do. We've been called to be a loving transforming presence in the world. There is a better way: One) we need to create a richer culture by producing art that tells the truth and does so in a craftsmanlike way. Don't get excited that "Christians are starting to make movies." Get excited when thoughtful, imaginative well made movies are porduced by people who are Christian; Two) We need to counterculture, resisting and fleeing when appropriate; Three) We need to communicate like ambassadors in culture, mastering the language of faith and culture and connecting the two.

Posted in Kindlings Hearth Alum Blog, Movies, Spirituality in June 6, 2006 by | No Comments »

Robert Deeble
Podcast: Segment 5 from 05/22/06

Robert Deeble Podcast: Segment 5 from 05/22/06

Robert Deeble was brave enough to appear at the first live event of The Kindlings Muse and brought the lyrics and sound that have been described as "wistful folk-pop, sparsely arranged, gracefully performed, and achingly beautiful to behold." His art is one that conjures such influences as Leonard Cohen and Nick Drake and has been likened to contemporaries such as James William Hindle and Josh Rouse." The two songs in this set are from his this bar has no one left Enjoy this live music from Hales Ales Brewery and Pub loft!

Play

Posted in "Live @ Hales", "TKM @ Homespun ~ Live Performances", A. Podcasts -- "The Kindlings Muse" in June 4, 2006 by | No Comments »

Irreligious Seattle & The Spiritual Book Craze.
Podcast: Segment 4 from 05/22/06

Our panel continues the discussion of irreligious Seattle, responding to audience questions: Is Seattle's renowned tolerance an excuse for avoiding dealing with reality? Is it more of go along to get along? Is it a barrier to real community? Would a pursuit of truths held passionately a better path? What about the three transcendentals: the good, the true, the beautiful? What about the role of Art and the passion for mystery? By the way the music as we come into the show in this segment is from "William and Alene" who will appear live in June!

Play

Posted in "Live @ Hales", A. Podcasts -- "The Kindlings Muse", Spirituality, Technology in June 2, 2006 by | 4 Comments »

The Kindlings Blog. Dick Staub. Opus Dei, Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code & You

The Kindlings Blog. Dick Staub. Opus Dei, Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code & You

Opus Dei. Controversial?

Look in the Columbia dictionary for a definition and you read: "Believing that a Catholic can lead a holy life without taking religious vows, lay members pledge to serve God in worldly vocations." "Opus" is a Latin word meaning "the work proves the craftsman." The Apostle Paul put it this way:" We are God's workmanship. As an organization Opus Dei has attracted derision in some circles because it is secretive, practices disciplines like self-immolation and is conservative in what for some are distressingly pre Vatican II ways.

The Hallmark Channel will carry a special on Opus Dei Sunday June 11 (check local, listings) and you will see how little resemblance the organization bears to Dan Brown's hapless albino Silas. You'll learn the cilise, strapped tightly around Silas leg dripping with blood, was actually used by Pope John Paul and Mother Theresa and never draws blood. It is a reminder of Christi's suffering producing a single-minded focus on identifying with Jesus, kind of a step above fasting.

After watching the Hallmark special you may conclude as I did that Opus Dei seems a tad on the legalistic side. I'm sure individual members are tempted with the smug self-righteousness I've seen in Protestant fundamentalism. But that Dan Brown could portray such a distorted image of Opus Dei is in keeping with the wild, National Enquirer-style conspiracy weaving of his entire book. Reviewers who call The Da Vinci Code extensively researched are the students you knew who used Cliff Notes and "The Onion" for their term papers. Our suspicions and concerns about Opus Dei say more about us than Opus Dei.

As far as I can tell the members of Opus Dei are seeking to live sanctified lives in the real world. Their roots are in Jesus who challenged his followers "if anyone wants to be my disciple, you must deny yourself, take up your cross and follow me. The early believers shared all things in common, worshipped daily, praying and fasting, as do members of Opus Dei today.

That one can live a holy life without taking special vows and joining a monastic, cloistered community, is exactly the message of Jesus. Today's easy breezy Christianity bears little resemblance to Opus Dei, but then it bears little resemblance to Jesus and his disciples either.

Yours for the pursuit of God in the company of friends, Dick Staub.

Posted in Books, Kindlings Hearth Alum Blog, Spirituality in June 1, 2006 by | 3 Comments »